The Crime against Humanity
In 2002 the Rome Statute established the International Criminal Court which hears cases in three areas: genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The Rome Protocol has been ratified by 122 countries including Canada, all the Latin American countries, the European Union, many African countries and a number of Asian countries including Japan and Thailand. The relevant sections dealing with crimes against humanity are:
We are calling on the countries that are Party to the Rome Protocol to investigate this situation with an eye to taking Greenpeace before the International Criminal Court to answer for their crime against humanity.
How anti-GM organizations demonize Golden Rice
There are several falsehoods used to create fear of Golden Rice. Here are some examples.
Claim: Farmers in the Phillipines recently tore up a Golden Rice research crop because they regard the rice as threatening their way of life.(collective evolution)
Reality: An Phillipine urban activist organization bussed in 400 farmers who thought they were attending a rally, and who looked on in dismay as the activists tore up the plants (Slate)
Claim: Even in 2013 Golden Rice is called a a 'bogus solution', as it requires eating 3 - 7 kilos/day to reach the daily recommended dose of Vitamin A (collective evolution)
Reality: Since 2005 improvments have brought Golden Rice to the point where the entire dietary requirement of Vitamin A is obtained by eating about 75g per day (Wikipedia)
Claim: No scientific data shows that significant Vitamin A can be absorbed by eating Golden Rice (grain.org)
Reality: In 2008 a joint clinical trial by joint American and Chinese scientists published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition completed nutritional trials which demonstrated that Golden Rice was as effective at providing Vitamin A as beta carotene pills. (Wikipedia)
Claim: The whole Golden Rice project is a corporate strategy to enrich seed producers like Monsanto and get farmers hooked to their monopolies. (gmeducation.org)
Reality: Monsanto and other seed companies have agreed that any farmer earning under $10,000/year will not pay any royalties on Golden Rice and may use the seed they produce. (Wikipedia)
Claim: Golden Rice is poisonous, leading to allergies and disease (bulatlat.com)
Reality: Golden Rice has been put through a deep risk-assesment process and shows no allergenic or toxic effects (Wikipedia)
Kumi Naidoo, director of Greenpeaxce. The organization's scientific blindness has led to the actual blindness of 8 million people, mostly children.
Greenpeace claims that Golden Rice is a "technical failure" and say it would be more effective if people with vitamin A deficiency were to take vitamin pills and create home gardens, where they could grow leafy vegetables that are rich in beta-carotene. From their plush international headquarters on the canals of Amsterdam, Greenpeace ignores the fact that the reason people suffer from the deficiency is because they are too poor to afford pills or garden space. And Greenpeace offers no aid to these people from its own bank accounts. Golden Rice co-inventor Dr. Potrykus stated as early as 2002 "If you plan to destroy test fields to prevent responsible testing and development of Golden Rice for humanitarian purposes, you will be accused of contributing to a crime against humanity. Your actions will be carefully registered and you will, hopefully, have the opportunity to defend your illegal and immoral actions in front of an international court."1
We believe Greenpeace's opposition to Golden Rice is a position held to justify its zero-tolerance approach to genetic modification in general. Greenpeace knows that if there is one good Geneticaly Modified (GM) variety, there will be others. The organization would then need to have a rational discussion about the merits of each variety. Instead, it prefers to stand on high in judgment, even though this condemns millions to needless suffering and death.
Opposition to GM displays a more subtle political agenda. It is not so much the concern about the environment, or the health of the consumer, or helping for the poor and disadvantaged. It is a radical fight against a technology as a political platform. This could be tolerated in rich countries where people enjoy a high standard of living, even without the technology. It cannot, however, be tolerated in developing countries, where the technology can make the difference between life and death, between good health or severe illness.
The anti-GM campaigners shamelessly claim the farmers are on their side because they are victims, by virtue of their innocence and gullibility, of the multinational companies' plant to enslave them with "toxic" seeds. It is always possible to find a few dissident farmers to support their cause, but there is no question the overwhelming majority of mainstream farmers support GM technology and the benefits it brings to them and their customers. The anti-GM forces are using farmers to gain sympathy from a largely urban support base that does not understand genetics and does not know what is going on out in the country.
Greenpeace cites the "precautionary principle" to defend its zero-tolerance position on Golden Rice. Greenpeace says, "Golden Rice could breed with wild and weedy relatives to contaminate wild rice forever. If there were any problems the clock could not be turned back."2 This implies that if a corn gene got into wild rice that would be worse than half a million blind children every year. What possible harm could rice plants cause with beta-carotene in them, a compound that occurs naturally in every green plant? All rice plants, including wild rice, already contain beta-carotene, but it is in their leaves, where it provides no nutritional benefits. Carotenes are not only essential for eyesight in all animals, they are also one of the most important anti-oxidants in our diet. When challenged, Greenpeace and other anti-GM organizations will not explain how beta-carotene or any other aspect of Golden Rice could have a negative impact on human health or the environment.
There is no doubt that the anti-GM organizations have real fears, but in the case of Golden Rice, there is no way that fear alone, or 'unforeseen possible circumstances' can justify their actions to stop the testing and deployment of a crop that goes to the heart of malnutrition among millions of people. It cannot justify condeming as many as half a million children to blindness and death each year.
1. Ingo Potrykus, " 'Golden Rice and the Greenpeace Dilemma' Second Response to Greenpeace from Prof. Ingo Potrykus," February 15, 2001